超光流浪汉

我打了大约40个小时的超光流浪汉和殴打比赛多次。我应对常识评估是基于我的经验。我相信主要的评论说,有一些优点,也有缺点。优点:审查是由小标题结构和类别。父母警告与特定的评级类别的内容(如积极信息、暴力等)。审查结束对孩子和父母讨论问题,升华讨论这个游戏。超轻流浪汉审查以一种有意义的提示:“家庭可以谈谈为什么世界末日似乎在小说中频繁出现。并思考如何将给我们更多目的或任何东西在当下的感觉吗?“这是一个非常积极的方式让玩家和读者想想游戏连接我们与真理或断开我们的现实。底片:我很遗憾地说,回顾这个页面是匆忙写的,看起来更像一个初稿或一条短信一个合适的刊物。 I noticed spelling errors and confusing grammar/usage throughout. Common Sense Media is a review group that focuses on game content, right? The review ought to focus on whether that content is positive, negative, objectionable or thought-provoking. However, over two-thirds of this review are dedicated towards technical gameplay and controls (see the section Is It Any Good?). By filling that entire subheading with a run-on commentary on how the reviewer felt about the combat pacing, controls and exploration, the review gives a strange impression: Does the “feel” of a game define if it’s “any good”? What happened to the content? I do not believe that the review focused sufficiently on the dystopian nature of the game and just how dark it is. I’m concerned by the attitude of the review, which felt disconnected from my experience with this game specifically and with my experience with game content in general. Again, I’ve played this game thoroughly, and I enjoyed it a lot. I don’t believe the level of objectionable content is unacceptable for adults as long as we're critical about what we're playing. But I’d only recommend the game to mature audiences, and the Common Sense rating of 13+ doesn’t properly respect the safety of kids of that age. Hyper Light Drifter is not a game for kids of any description and players should consider whether the game’s positive ending (heroism, bravery, self-sacrifice for others) is worth the morose setting and imagery of death.

首先我想说,这游戏确实是美丽的。的像素化SNES-like图形,柔和的色彩与黑色的颜色对比……等等,为什么不是有人说过吗? !超光流浪汉确实有一个故事,但这并不是通过对话框,它是世界上设计,通过定期的混乱场面你看和周围环境的颜色。对于那些想要对我说什么,我给你我的解释:你扮演一个角色是谁造成了绝症,你寻找一个治疗。你漫游在整个土地和访问你能想到的每一个神来帮助治愈你的疾病只有同样的疾病,枯萎了神之前,你可以寻求帮助。最终足够的神死去,世界再也不能维持本身和它开始分崩离析。你降至一个洞的底部,失去知觉,你有一个梦想,世界正在重建,和一只狗(我认为是最后的神)指导你回你的意识。这之后你去寻求重建世界,抓住所需的所有碎片重生神并返回他们规则只有你的机器人来帮助你。一路上你会遇到其他的人也遭受相同的绝症。 This game is by no means easy, and has a strategy aspect to it. I'll be the first to admit that I died 20 some odd times to the first boss in the game. I feel as if this was deliberate, not because Heart Machine wanted to frustrate the player, but because it would make sense in the story aspect. When you have a terminal illness that is quite literally eating you alive it makes it harder to do basic tasks that we as humans take for granted (moving for one, breathing is another.) Secondly, the difficulty is there to make you think. There are certain enemies you WANT to get in their face, and there are some you wouldnt want to touch with a 99 foot pole but would gladly shoot the laser pistol through their skull. Add on the combat mechanic of so many hits of objects or enemies with your sword recharges your gun and you have some split-second thinking and decision making to do. Once you get used to it and learn how to glean the story from what you see, you have a game made by a small company that is a MASTERPIECE in today's gaming landscape. The only reason I give it a 12+ is the theme of the game requires someone who is not only mature but empathetic enough to really hit home.