公元:《圣经》Continues

这个系列我们就很兴奋,但中途第二个磁盘,我们实际上正在讨论是否继续。没有办法我们会允许我们敏感的儿子看这个,他是一个孩子。我们知道,暴力和恐怖的现实条件在罗马人的统治下,但给我印象最深的是,耶稣宣讲的福音的信息,后来由他的门徒剪短,留下一个人渴望听到更多,而暴力从未供不应求。暴力是恒定的,免费的,不健康的,任何人在他们的大脑和心脏。我得到,也许他们试图阻止“在那里,这样做”的经验,可以发生在一个教堂长凳长大,读《圣经》他们的整个生活,但有一线之隔描绘生动的方式讲述一个故事,能够做到的方式满足腓立比书4:8的警告。也有问题的一些历史细节,可能是更好的。总的来说,作为一名家长,这不是我想要我的孩子去看,和作为一个成年人,我不确定我应该继续看。阅读有关性的审查,强奸后,我真的想知道。可以描述事实没有把图片,最终是不健康的和邪恶的在一个人的心中。这部电影没有在这个部门,我失望,插入评论我们读未能真正大纲我们看到。 As Christians, I don't think this movie is one I can recommend to another Christian. And when considering it as a way to share Jesus with those who don't know Him, I'm not sure this is a great tool for that either.

没有其他评论者,图拉真没有成功提比略,卡里古拉。系列的消息是非常强大的和移动的配乐。代理、服装和道具重建似乎很好,有很多的行动,它非常有趣。性不是描绘,而是有一些非常暴力的场景。最好是对那些十八九岁及以上。起初它通常遵循圣经事件的序列与序列等偏差,但它遵循正确的序列随着赛季的进行。同时最好的阅读行为。但它是神奇的把圣经时代的生命意识和日常生活的各个方面都描述得很好。然而,抹大拉的马利亚和彼得的女儿太现代西方的方式描绘的准确性,如女儿的怪脸,她的父亲和他的允许它,这是无稽之谈。大量的自由与历史信息,以及一些历史的偏见和错误的解释人们的角色,像彼拉多一样,Caiphas和亚。例如,Caiphas提出了可能有点过于同情和彼拉多过于严厉。 I agree that his presentation was too one-dimensional. It was, also too extreme. He made judgement errors but may not have been so deliberately cruel. Rome made much effort to respect Judaean religious laws although Pilate was less adept at this. Agrippa I was proficient at intrigue but was never portrayed by ancient sources as promiscuous/licentious or lecherous. He is described by Josephus as having had a good relationship with his wife. Tiberius never wanted to put Agrippa to death and Agrippa seems to have wielded much more power over Pilate than the reverse, since he might be part of the reason at least that Pilate was recalled to Rome and possibly exiled. He also had Antipas exiled. Tiberius and Caligula never visited Judaea. Agrippa was king of a larger kingdom of Herod the Great, and Pilate and Antipas had been exiled by the time Peter was imprisoned and escaped. It was Agrippa as king who imprisoned him. Agrippa's political policy involved serious adherence to Judaism while in Jerusalem. By this time as, well, Caligula and then Claudius had already succeeded Tiberius. Early in Claudius' reign, Agrippa moved permanently to Judaea. I agree that the second part of the series is very historically flawed. I don't see why this is necessary: it would have been more effective for it to adhere to at least most of the facts. There is much debate as to Caligula's true nature since the sources available are based on Claudius' smear campaign after the former's assassination. To disagree with another comment: Trajan was not a Julio-Claudian and he ruled several decades later. Caligula most definitely did succeed Tiberius. The historical accuracy worsens in the last few episodes. As, well, Caligula's statue was, never taken to Jerusalem. It was the Syrian governor Petronius and Agrippa I, back in Rome with Caligula, who persuaded Caligula to rescind his order, which was, finally completely cancelled with Caligula's death. Pilate had nothing to do with it. The actual history is much more dramatic than the episode. I fail to understand why the series avoided this, although it would have needed a couple more actors and a Roman setting. I'd give it 3.5 rather than 4 stars for the historical and historical characterizational flaws. That might be why the series was discontinued which is too bad. The series is otherwise very dramatic and entertaining all the same. If it is, revived or something similar is created, adhering to historicity would make a world of difference.