家长评论猜猜谁来吃晚餐》?

就完全可以理解如果有人批评这部电影玩很安全在一些严重的风险在一开始,这个故事,这样做不仅逐步成为公式化的;但是人物似乎刻板,而且最糟糕的是,自相矛盾的和不一致的。也就是说,这里的表演无疑是足以克服这些问题和救赎他们,不,完全证明这些看似荒谬的变化和改变发生的一些字符,马特和克里斯蒂娜•德雷顿最明显。我见过很多伟大的表演能够提升人物乃至整个电影。但是,坦率地说,我从来没有见过任何性能,无论多么出色的可能,能说服我我认为是毫无疑问的主要缺陷。让我欣赏表演,特别是,在这部电影中,它开阔了我的眼界,让一些隐藏的潜在主题电影的故事,这是超过基本正确地理解这部电影。如果极为现实的和真诚的表演,不知怎么的,不做同样的为你,我建议你尝试找出一些关键主题考虑你看电影。的两个最重要的主题是;复兴末期的继承了可怕的传统和信仰,和未被发现的虚伪。是的,这就是明显的深远意义电影其实很简单! Of course, the shift in Matt Drayton's attitude could have been executed way more smoothly and maturely; but the abrupt nature of the changes could be fairly, if not quite easily, taken as a reflection of the character's disorder. Spencer Tracy, in his final role, gave, for lack of a better word, a mature performance that made his character surprisingly believable despite its outwardly incompatible attitudes that made the character of Matt Drayton seem to be immensely problematic. Sidney Poitier's performance, as the handsome African-American Dr. John Prentice, is solid, steady, committed, engaging and relatable at the same time. Katharine Houghton captured the rebelliousness, impetuousness, and also the innocence of her character, Joey, so perfectly. She reminded me quite a bit of another Katharine; Katharine Ross as Elaine Robinson in The Graduate, which was, also coincidentally, released at the same year, 1967. But it's Katharine Hepburn who stole the show here with her Oscar-winning performance that I personally consider as one of the best low-key performances in a leading female role I've ever seen in film! I would be lying if I said that I found the second half of the movie half as entertaining and riveting. Nevertheless, the dialogue was much better at the second half (the final monologue is simply remarkable!) as it was at the first, which is noticeably elevated by, once again, the incredible acting. The movie is decidedly filled with stereotypical characters, but the only one that bothered me is the maid, Tillie, whom I didn't find to be funny at all; actually she is quite annoying. Her character's motivations and attitudes are justified, though. Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner is an essential classic 1960s film, and one of the best films that examine prejudice and racism; it tackles its weighty themes with surprising depth, humor and breeziness. It's also very relevant nowadays. And there is no doubt that it has major influences on hundreds of movies that came after it, especially today's. (8.5/10)

他们说一个* *,* * * * *,& B * * * *,但只有一次。女服务员很粗鲁,她是说N词。有喝它,但是很休闲。祭司在要求另一个喝得像他强调,他为什么需要它。之间有争论的时刻即将成为新郎和他的父亲。他们也说“性”这个词。除此之外,这是一个很棒的电影,同年interacial婚姻合法化。如果他们足够成熟不使用某些词和理解消息他们将是一个很棒的电影观看学习历史上这一次。

我看着这个和我almost-8-year-old女儿(进入二年级),这是一个很好的电影给她看。她真的很喜欢它,谈论它一段时间。我们是白色的和她去一个种族混合学校,在一年级已经学到了很多关于偏见和黑人和白人的不同治疗前60的,(即通过教学关于灵魂,罗莎·帕克斯,Ruby桥梁,等等)。我提前向她解释了电影情节,和她谈了整个电影在电影里发生了什么。l相信,使用黑的黑人女仆Sidney Poitier和沮丧当她跟他。我没有和我的女儿谈谈,我不认为这为她注册以任何方式,因为我不认为她还学会了这个词和它是如何使用的。也有一些由成年人饮酒和吸烟。总的来说,这是一个教育电影为我女儿,给了我们机会谈论种族问题。

这部电影很好,一个古老的经典。这样一个积极的信息,可以帮助打开孩子的思想不同种族的人们之间的平等和爱/背景。我喜欢它,我认为这是非常tween-appropriate。

猜猜谁来吃晚餐》绝对是一部电影你会想让你的孩子,这是一个电影应该展示给所有人。它不仅是一部制作精良的电影(脚本和精湛的演技赢得),但这是一个令人振奋的,积极克服偏见和歧视的故事。集中在家庭压力的电影,围绕着一个跨种族的夫妇,一开始真使我惊讶钝描绘的偏见(有几个明显的种族引用和这对夫妇的色素的差异通常被称为,甚至un-bigoted的人,作为一个问题),但因为它继续我印象深刻的是电影的积极因素和良好的榜样。夫妇都是震惊的父母发现他们的儿子/女儿的情人是一个不同的颜色,但夫妇超越他们的偏见,接受和尊重。这部电影描绘了种族主义和偏见非常消极的光,和所有的字符作为伟大的榜样对孩子。你想要看到过去频繁,温和的语言(几个“d * * n”和“h * * l”年代,+ 2 b * * * h”和一个“b”* * * * rd),看这一个和你的孩子。你不会失望的。