怪物公司。
电影评论的Nell Minow,常2022世界杯16强预测识媒体
![怪物公司。海报图片](/sites/default/files/styles/ratio_2_3_small/public/product-images/csm-movie/monsters-cover.jpg)
怪物公司。
我们是不是错过了什么关于多样性的东西?
研究表明,儿童健康的自尊与媒体的正面描述之间存在联系。这就是为什么我们在我们的审查中增加了一个新的“多样化陈述”部分,并将持续推出。你可以帮助我们帮助孩子们建议进行多样性更新。
怪物公司。
显示一个更新
多还是少?
这部电影的家长指南。
突出的
而且.
Did you know you can flag iffy stuff with Plus? Adjust limits for Violence & Scariness in your kid's entertainment guide. Join now
">
Did you know you can flag iffy stuff with Plus? Adjust limits for Sex, Romance & Nudity in your kid's entertainment guide. Join now
">
Toy Story toys are on the floor in one child's room.
">
父母需要知道什么
父母需要知道这一点怪物公司。是关于柜子里的怪物,但在他们看来,恐吓孩子是他们朝九晚五的工作。孩子们一开始可能会对电影的概念感到害怕,但他们很快就会发现,怪物毛怪是一个温柔的人,他照顾着故事中一点也不怕他的小女孩。但是有一场戏,一个孩子害怕的怪物把她绑在椅子上,试图偷走她的尖叫。孩子们会觉得有趣的是,大多数怪物都害怕与孩子接触——当一个怪物被孩子的袜子穿在身上时,整个工厂都会恐慌起来,生物危害工人会隔离它并给它剃毛。年幼的孩子可能需要帮助来理解穿黄衣服的怪物对他做了什么以及为什么。注意:的2022世界杯赛程安排 版本增强了强度。
社会评论
2020年12月10日,
最好的电脑动画电影,也是最成人的
直到现在,我都不能让自己相信电脑动画和定格动画或手绘动画是一样的。所有的电脑动画电影看起来都有点(通常是有点)过于乏味,许多动画制作得很糟糕(如《蚁人总动员》、《怪物史莱克》、《最终幻想》),即使是唯一一个不合格的成功(如《玩具总动员2》),也没有证据表明电脑动画电影可以达到其他类型动画所能达到的高度。《玩具总动员2》(Toy Story 2)的人物动画完美无瑕,但没有《人猿泰山》(Tarzan)(同一年上映,尽管我可以选择几乎任何其他迪士尼动画片来证明我的观点)中最棒的那一部那么有灵感;有效的艺术指导,但比不上《幻想曲》或《圣诞节前的梦魇》。我认为《玩具总动员2》是它的艺术所能达到的最好水平。我错了。这样好多了。更重要的是,无论剧本(一个异常丰富和不受约束的剧本)如何冲击媒介所允许的极限,都没有任何意义。现在已经证明,电脑动画可以和其他任何形式的动画一样好。未来是否会被允许是另一个问题,但就目前而言,我充满希望。 What we have here is computer animation's first ENTIRELY unalloyed artistic delight, with every character gracefully and characteristically animated, every virtual set just right and pleasing to look at, and an eye-tickling mastery of colour, light and shade that I thought would forever elude CGI artists. It's not fair to judge anything good as "Monsters, Inc." as though it were a children's movie, but I can't resist comparing it with "Shrek" - which emphatically IS a children's movie. "Monsters, inc." is admittedly ABOUT children, in a sort of a way. The inhabitants of Monstropolis rely on children's screams for their energy, and the central story is kicked off when one of the monsters accidentally brings a small child (which he calls "Boo") into the city. But we never see things from her point of view. We see things from the point of view of the monsters, who are all adults - and who, like most adults, see children as frightening, almost incomprehensible members of another species. And they ARE. To be sure, Wazowski comes to feel strong affection for Boo, but she never becomes more than a humanoid pet (which is not to demean the relationship). This is a story about adults looking at childhood from the outside. "Shrek", of course, is a children's movie through and through. Its attention span is short, it has an unthinking mean streak, and children will have a whale of a time watching the central characters (the bigger they are, the more fun it is) act childishly and make poo-poo jokes. "Monsters, Inc." has too much genuine wit, characters too rich, a world with too much depth, and a story at once too coherent and too complicated, to be PRIMARILY a film for children. This is not to say children won't like it. Maybe they will. (Who can say?) Here's the bonus: if they DO like it, it will (unlike "Shrek") actually have a beneficial effect. It will make them less frightened of the dark.
有一个人认为这很有帮助。
本综述报告
2018年5月17日
我喜欢这部电影!
萨伦伯格
有一个人认为这很有帮助。
本综述报告
我们的编辑推荐
给喜欢怪物的孩子
人格力量
寻找更多帮助孩子塑造性格的电影。
主题和主题
浏览主题相似的标题。
2022世界杯16强预测常识媒体的公正评级是由专家评审员制定的,不受产品创造者或我们的任何资助者、联属公司或合作伙伴的影响。
看看我们的评分