公主的行

这部电影是独特而强烈感情色彩的。我的评级更提醒你如何CSM这是看过的。语言:人们很少使用出场的? !在第一世界舞台,在最初的梦想序列,你有半打在草原出场超过一分钟。所有积极喊几个字符。性不存在? ! !中途这部电影中有一幕非常清楚地表明一个成年男人提出一个未成年的孩子接受钱给她的美丽一个成年的男人有很多钱以换取所有她的美貌和她同意穿好衣服。然后显示礼服。这个女孩准备和幻想。成年男子走进门。 And that’s when I had to stop the film. Whatever the next scene was, my 9 and 11 year old girls were just too aware of the issue, and I was simply furious at the careless review by CSM. Many films have warnings about “married couples embrace” and “a teenage couple kisses and then they’re seen the next morning implying they spent the night together”. And yet in this film where child prostitution and trafficking are heavily implied and partially shown the review states “sex not present”?!!! The adult gives her wine right after he explains the scheme of “a man who has money and you have a lot of beauty” and that’s rated “infrequent drinking”? Even my children were able to ask “is that what a drugged drink would be” I’m ok with watching a film like this but I’m extremely disappointed to be blindsided by a website for which I have been paying a yearly subscription for two years to be so careless. An adult man unbuckles his belt and pulls down his pants next to a minor’s face and it still states “no sex present”?!