罗密欧+朱丽叶

的大部分评论这部电影让我知道有多少人可以阅读原始的玩。不要看这部电影和抱怨暴力和性:原来都充斥着玩。开场是一个街头斗殴,两个字符后死亡,和两个自杀。而探索文本在课堂上我告诉我的学生认为一切来自茂丘西奥的嘴让人想起50深浅的灰色。他绝对是肮脏的,罗密欧和班,每当他们在一起,罗密欧不是闷闷不乐。罗密欧的唯一原因是如此的沮丧一开始玩的,因为他不能再从罗莎琳,一个女孩他是被追捕,但他一直不愿回应。这是一本关于鲁莽轻率的青少年和太多的时间和太多的钱在他们的血液。这部影片显示,所以期待最糟糕的行为。这部电影是一个精确的描述两个夸张的孩子爱的想法,而不是真正的爱彼此(通常由劳伦斯修士所述)。莎士比亚模拟年轻的爱情只不过是盲目的欲望,造成麻烦。 It's not romantic; it's volatile, and there is no message of peace at the root of the film as Common Sense Media states in their review. There is only one character who doesn't just talk about peace but actively works toward it, and that's the Friar who lies and manipulates to achieve his goal. The parts other reviewers complain about are all in the original play. If you don't like this film because it's too violent and hyper-sexualized, complain about the book, not the film. Baz Lurhmann nails it without getting too graphic or too sexual. It's intense, but so is the book; the film just cuts out the boring parts and moves along faster. Want to better understand what was really going on in the play? This film is the one to watch.

作为一名高中教师,我发现这是一个更全面的适应。60的版本,尽管真正的时期,拥有大量的裸体和过时的图像,并不表现在现代课堂环境太好了。如果预计9年级学生阅读《罗密欧与朱丽叶》作为课程的一部分,那么它只是配件,其电影改编不应该疏远高中学生。鲁曼的版本没有。没有公然裸露;暴力的存在,但它是非常不自然的和hyperbolized的方式处理,以便学生能够区分事实与假象。我看过3商业适应性。这个莎士比亚经典而不适用简化语言。只是准备打开视觉并列与你的学生。时可以得到奇怪的字符将自动武器称为剑和匕首。