父母的指导

苍蝇

通过布莱恩·科斯特洛,2022世界杯16强预测常识媒体评论家

16岁或以上

80年代经典恐怖有一些暴力、血腥的时刻。

电影 R 1986年 95分钟
动态海报图片

了一次或者很多次吗?

你意志,而在这部电影赢得了找不到。

">

社会评论

13岁或以上

基于3父评论

16岁或以上

出色的可怕!

裸体午餐是唯一柯南伯格看到这个之前我看过,虽然我不能说我喜欢它甚至一点点;我敬佩创造力的闪光在115分钟运行时我看到一个极其冷漠的节奏和自我放纵。因此,我乐观地认为,这个著名的独立董事的奇异风格可以有一天为我工作。这一天可能来了,或者也许只是这部电影。不管怎样,我能说的是,我绝对是对的!首先,克里斯wala鹤立鸡群,奥斯卡化妆效果只是超级恶心!最后转换例子,我真的没见过比的效果更令人印象深刻,除了同样出色的实际影响,被用于木工的东西。更令人惊叹的是成熟的每一个角色在这部电影中。他们是整个电影的三幕不断发展。和每个行动增加了更多的层在最优雅和合理的方式。 I want to confess that I have never considered Jeff Goldblum as an excellent actor. I always see him as one of the most charismatic actors, who play the same character in every film he's in, and I'm totally fine with that. That's because his quirky distinctive style of acting almost always pays off terrifically, so much so that his character steals the show every time. That said, the different phases his character go through in this movie prove that Goldblum's appeal isn't the only thing he has. For my surprise, Jeff Goldblum turned out to be a really talented actor who can flesh-out his character, figuratively and literally, masterfully. Geena Davis is quite good as Veronica Quaife, whose character arc and the development of her romantic affair with the protagonist near the end reminded me of Belle in Beauty and the Beast a little bit. I think Stathis Borans is an insufferably cartoonish character during the first act. John Getz is not blame at all, as I think he really did a good job. Fortunately, Stathis is also a pretty strongly-developed character that changed a great deal at the third act, and hence became more credible. I was overwhelmed by different feelings of pity, fear, disgust, and so many others, in the course of the movie's 96-min run-time. However, I think the denouement lacks intensity, since I found the ending predictable, and I saw it coming a bit early. Other than the issues I've mentioned above, this movie really impressed me with all its creativity and originality. Cronenberg is truly a visionary filmmaker, and I hope I enjoy the rest of his filmography. (8.5/10)

这个标题有:

伟大的消息
太多的暴力
太多的性
过多的饮酒/药品/吸烟
1人发现这有帮助。
10岁+

柯南伯格最好

这个标题有:

太多的暴力

这是什么好吗?

我们的评估:
父母说(3):
孩子们说(12):

时尚的同时,计算机技术,鲻鱼的头发,和大烫发岁还没好,这部影片的其余部分已经经受住了时间的考验。杰夫·戈德布拉姆的商标言谈举止和语音语调让他疯狂科学家性格低调但平原尴尬,补偿他慢慢地变得多么有威胁性,首先在他的行为,然后在他的外表。这human-to-insect蜕变的故事是导演大卫·柯南伯格的完美工具,著名的nightmare-inducing意象等电影扫描仪,Videodrome,裸体午餐

像所有的好故事,苍蝇充分利用可能性的前提。微妙的起初,Brundle下降后方糖无休止的方糖成卡布奇诺在最初阶段变成一只苍蝇,例如,每一步慢慢变得更加险恶的。这是希区柯克的缓慢燃烧变成一种艺术形式。恐慌和戈尔进行有机的故事,避免不必要的过度其他很多恐怖电影。很有趣的,恐怖的,令人毛骨悚然,总值,引人入胜,恐怖经典。

电影的细节

我们错过了一些多样性吗?

研究表明孩子们的健康的自尊心之间的连接和媒体积极描述。这就是为什么我们已经添加了一个新的“多元表征”一节我们的评论,将推出一个正在进行的基础。你可以帮助我们帮助孩子们表明多样性更新。

2022世界杯16强预测常识媒体的公正的评级是由专家评审和不影响产品的创造者或任何我们的资助者,分支机构或合作伙伴。

看看我们的速度