最后弗米尔

这不是对孩子有大量的烟熏和裸体等等,其自我充其量只是好电影。

这个非常好看生产敢于承担几个有争议的问题。如荷兰抵抗的作用之前和之后的帝国,荷兰政府内部协作的水平(这里只暗示)和社会。同样,艺术的重要性作为一个社会和经济建设v / s人才的评估。谁来决定哪个更重要时,艺术、政府、经销商、艺术历史学家,人呢?肯定不是普通大众,大多数买不起小镇,所以它落在左,他们想要达到的结果——毕竟,每个国家都争取伟大的作家和艺术家,他们的世界地位。这里我们有一个独特的故事大师艺术伪造者,汉族van Meergeren,基本上一个骗子,可能愚弄了纳粹,他还是与他们合作吗?很高兴看到如此高的产品价值是投资于高质量的电影设置WW11之后。在所有基于“事实”的电影,事实是一场移动的盛宴,但至少我们可以看到曙光的情况下处理,因为他们可能会发生在这些时间。表演也是高质量的,尽管也许,有些可能是演员,而有意IE;也许那些合作,有些定型在弱侧? Maybe they were but in movies, this can come across as a form of biased hate revenge. The courtroom scenes are well-staged and hold interest throughout and certainly cast doubt on the ability of art ‘experts’ to prove their claims. That said, it also raises the question of whether our art forger really is a hero, or just another opportunistic collaborator? Will we ever know? Several trials over many decades have followed, raising doubts over the authenticity of these ‘forgeries’, bringing into further question the claims of the Dutch government and many so-called art experts. The fact that it’s taken so many tests and trials - over such a long time span, makes one question our ability to fully confirm these facts. Recommended viewing for serious lovers of movies dealing with historical themes.