埃及王子

我认为埃及王子是一个神奇的电影,但它不是小孩子,因为它非常vilonte和强烈的埃及人的鞭子奴隶与主角的噩梦一场噩梦,他们的埃及人需要一位母亲和她的宝宝离屏并杀死他们的照片所示的埃及人把婴儿扔进河里满是鳄鱼埃及几乎鞭子老人死亡但主角救了他通过把埃及的结构,以他的死上帝告诉摩西放下他的员工,他把河水变成血这个城市被烧毁雾从天上下来,杀死了很多孩子,他们甚至显示一个孩子死在屏幕上和水下来,淹没所有的埃及人除了主角哥哥他们也非常成人的性暗示主角命令一个人去床上室与一个女孩如此我认为埃及王子是青少年和成人,我不推荐任何13岁以下的

(用户)的妻子写的一次你的孩子知道故事的目的,可以表现出对事物的类型电影中(鞭打,危险,有人stub脚一把锋利的岩石上)他们准备看这个。这是我不确定你想要看这个跟我们一样。加班你开始皮卡上的东西让它不如我以为是(我建议约瑟夫国王的梦想而不是前传)。我知道先知的妻子有自己的观点和很聪明耶,这很好,但是为什么她描绘成仇恨吗?先知从他的养母(拿出一个页面,但他真正的母亲抚养他的护士?他们切断自己的影响力),让她逃了出来,她还没有原谅他,即使她知道他的善良(她让他掉下来,可能真的伤害他)。她也仍然在她的奴隶衣服整个电影暴露了很多她的腿边,显然她没有发现愤慨。他们提到虽然她难以吸引男人,值得庆幸的是她从不打了他喜欢很多其他电影的男性作家/导演就像哦,我们怎么让他们坚强,我知道我们会让它们的意思和时髦的,女人喜欢什么的(我不),但是她非常接近这样的女主角。我喜欢他们如何试图捕捉中东/非洲种族——然而他们不做一个非常伟大的工作,每个人看起来都相同的虽然埃及是多样化的,虽然你看到在背后画。看起来也不是犹太人如何(不相信我,去看网上图片在中东的),我知道人不相信以色列人是真实的,当他们看到他们,因为这部电影。 If they were going to be accurate they would have had a lot of redheads (they used to have as many redheads among that community as the Irish before it led to them being easy targets during the diaspora; redheads occur in all cultures, it's not a white thing)--I didn't see a single one. Not being culturally sensitive like this can have consequences, I remember seeing a news story about a man waving a gun at people and threating to shoot unless they confessed that Jesus looked a certain way. Then there's the intentional or not Easter eggs. In one scene the prophet's future wife is dancing around him and if you slow it down you can tell she groped him by his face. Then there's the weird shape of the water in the end--kind of suggestive, hopefully I'm overthinking it. I love seeing the suggestion that they had converts in the area when they started their journey back to the promised land, I really do. But there's something here that qualifies as religiously insensitive--it occurs during the final song and wrap up scenes. I don't know what to make of one situation that I really don't have a problem seeing in other movies because that's life, but doesn't work here. The little girl with the two moms works in other movies, but since this is a culture that had very strict rules, it doesn't fit with the background and needs explaining. I originally thought it was a widow whose mother had stepped in because of the year it was made (and that's probably why no one else mentioned it), but watching it again and again it's not and they show that situation multiple times. They made sure the women are the same age and clearly show that the little girl definitely doesn't descend from them. Once again works in other movies and I wouldn't mention it otherwise unless there's something obsene. But I feel it's hard to swallow in a Bible story because faiths are struggling all the time to be taken seriously and have real accusations they have to deal with and if you just rewrite what was acceptable in their history then you put faiths at risk at not being seen as accredited by their country and at risk of persecution. The western world that this is marketed to has to deal with churches/synagogues/mosques being seen as not a real religion for practicing what they've always practiced--which could lead to loss of tax status or worse. In these contexts (sorry for being wordy, I just don't want there to be any guideline misunderstandings) a rewrite being pushed through media causes more hurt then help to struggling faiths as the culture changes.