父母和孩子评论

零黑暗三十

零黑暗三十海报形象
我们的审查
16岁或以上

基于9父评论

18岁+

零暗三十是恐怖和人性的阴暗面

零暗三十是恐怖和人性的阴暗面。这部电影揭露了残酷的恐怖和所需的残酷斗争。人们的承诺致力于消除可怕的人类和人类的友谊和灵魂强大的正面消息。不是无力的,但也是生活!
16岁或以上

是的

生,错综复杂、微妙和务实的反恐战争剥夺了政治和不可告人的议程。我们看到它的影响涉及试验和情报工作者必须经由突破困难,即使他们已经穿越危险的边界。人物有多个边玩到,有时对彼此达到目的。最后的搜捕行动是尽可能引人入胜。折磨的场景令人不安(尤其是恐怖囚犯的接地描述)而不是给你们带来年度描绘甚至ouright显示。恐怖袭击包括射击的人在举办游园会血腥伤口显示但不逗留。最后阶段显示了伤亡敌意和平民尽可能事实上与血腥的bool和身体的后果。有点频繁的F字但其拉伸将在两点半+小时
16岁或以上

零黑暗三十

很值得看,尽管一些令人不安的场景。

这个标题有:

太多的暴力
太多的咒骂
过多的饮酒/药品/吸烟
15岁+

发人深思的电影!

Whatan杰出的电影,最好的一个。因为本拉登最近的死亡,青少年会疼痛去看这出戏。但粗语言和暴力使这部电影你很难让你的孩子看到。戈尔-没有任何戈尔。暴力——沉重的射击等重型暴力血腥的结果显示在新闻报道;一个自杀式炸弹在营地,一个受欢迎的角色死亡;和各种酷刑场面98%被水刑的图形描述简明扼要。然而,最糟糕的是当一个人对电影的发出召唤剥下来一个狗项圈是依附于他,他是在房间里和他背后显示(可见faece在他背后)。也有明显的尿和faecial物质在地板上。我很震惊,常识媒体没有接这是其中一个2022世界杯16强预测最令人不安的场景电影! Language - Many frequent uses of the F-word and low uses of S**t. Sex - as part of humiliation torture, a man has his pants stripped and his naked behind is shown soaked in faecial matter. Before a raid, a man thnks Maya for her courage and says without her hed be raped in a Pakistani Prison which coukd be referred to as racism as well. Racism - Not a lot of it, but the al - Qaeda are often reffered to as the 'Paks' In conclusion I think anyone under the age of 15 will find the movie frankly disturbing due to torture and the humiliation some prisoners are forced into.

这个标题有:

伟大的消息
伟大的榜样
太多的暴力
太多的性
太多的咒骂
过多的饮酒/药品/吸烟
13岁或以上

医生称其13岁

我相信零暗三十是一生一次的oprotunity青少年与外界联系。你可能会认为我疯了,但这是真的。青少年不考虑外国政治或任何美国以外的。我相信,允许他们看到这部电影将种乐趣他们美国的外面的世界。然而,有一点暴力,但我相信有人在青少年的时候,他们会看到足够的暴力,暴力在这部电影并不是一个大问题。(相信我我是一个治疗师)

这个标题有:

太多的暴力
15岁+

零黑暗30(2013)评审Shivom Oza——半生不熟的真实生活的戏剧表演

9/11/2001是一个被遗忘的日期。没有特定的情绪,你可以连接到这个事件。第一个真正的“不安全”的感觉爬进我们的意识,当世界上最强大的国家被一群恐怖分子袭击,几乎瘫痪。仅仅几天后9/11,向世界可怕的脸了。那张脸应该是负责的恐怖袭击,这降低了世界贸易中心双子塔和接管了3000人的生命。很快,面对世界上一切邪恶的代名词。他成为了“吉祥物”,可以这么说,恐怖主义。这不是别人,正是基地组织领导人奥萨马·本·拉登。美国呼吁他的头,开始追捕他的使命和消除他。在这部影片中,团队,追捕世界上最可怕的恐怖分子,(尽管不是最初)牵头的玛雅(杰西卡•查斯坦茵饰)。 Other CIA persons include Dan (Jason Clarke), Joseph Bradley (Kyle Chandler) and Jessica (Jennifer Ehle). The film concentrates on the major events that lead to the killing of Osama in May 2011. In the interim, we are shown how the CIA goes about doing their job, which includes interrogation, building a good network in a foreign country, keeping an eye out for every possible clue and identifying connections between statements given by criminals/terrorists. It is a tough job, and the film shows it as it is. However, what the audiences are made to miss out on is proper explanation about every clue that the CIA gets in its run-up to finding Bin Laden. Names are thrown in, major terrorist strikes such as the 2005 London bombing and the Marriott Hotel blast among others are featured, more names are thrown in, assassination attempts are made on the CIA officers and more names are thrown in. This entire Osama manhunt is an absolutely brilliant subject to capture on celluloid. However, trying to fit in 8 years into an hour-and-half (regarding the first half of the film) is an impossible job. If one wishes to educate the viewer, more information should be dispensed through the work of art (film, book anything!). Here, it’s just one random event followed by another and suddenly, voila! We found Bin Laden’s carrier! YOU could have, but how do WE know? The main purpose for anyone to watch this particular film would be, besides being entertained, to actually know about how the US went about looking for the Al Qaeda leader. Sadly, it is not clear enough. The second-half, in comparison, is way more superior, owing to the fact that this section only covers a year or so in the lead-up to the final attack. It’s much more understandabe, swift-paced and follows a linear path (as all real-life based films should, ideally!). The actual mission ‘Operation Geronimo’ is definitely going to keep you on the edge of your seats. The final 30 minutes of the film are gripping and filled with emotionally-charged moments. As far as the performances go, everybody in the cast has done a fine job. Chastain has delivered a brilliant performance. However, it is not the best of the year. The locations could have been a huge problem. All the ‘Pakistan’ areas shown in the film were actually shot in Chandigarh, India. The locations have been perfectly altered to be made to look like they are cities in Pakistan. There are a few blips, such as shops bearing Hindu names and cars of Indian-make, but you can’t pan them down for everything. Their efforts to convert a small section of Chandigarh into Pakistan are commendable. The screenplay, as already pointed out, bears several flaws. This film could have actually been a documentary series. The subject, as already mentioned, is first-rate and the story deserves to be told in a truthful, elaborate manner. 'Zero Dark Thirty' can be watched for entertainment. However, to know what actually happened, start looking for books and articles. Kathryn Bigelow, the director, has made a half-baked real-life drama. It is highly unsurprising that she hasn't bagged a n Oscar nomination for Best Direction. Just a thought - Don't believe the solution to terrorism lies in capital punishments, air raids, counter bombings, revenge and retribution. Let’s give peace a chance, till they don’t start doing the same. Shivom Oza

这个标题有:

伟大的消息
伟大的榜样
太多的暴力
太多的咒骂
过多的消费主义
过多的饮酒/药品/吸烟
17岁或以上

剪掉?不是。

文献片不是,可悲的是现实的扭曲会记得好像他们是真相。
15岁+

漫长、黑暗和坚毅

铆接的女主角,中情局特工找到本拉登。酷刑场面的描写是惊人的,但不是过度的图形,值得赞美的关键是收到了。这部电影很长,但它使你的注意力。我不喜欢电影的结尾后成功的袭击。当我欣赏酷刑的客观描述,缺乏积极的情感反应在突袭后似乎操纵,好像试图迫使观众操作本身的道德问题。这部电影结束开始,黑暗和坚毅,没有情感的解脱或关闭我怀疑很多观众可能有希望。

这个标题有:

太多的暴力
太多的咒骂
16岁或以上

很棒的电影,没有政治倾向

刚刚看到这个和我的妻子。我们都同意,酷刑场面有点紧张但好过很多动作片,不像一些媒体描绘的那么糟。它使我们讨论它所带来的好处,同时它是多么糟糕。没有911年over-dramatization或军事行动。这部电影有点长(我的妻子认为),但保留我的兴趣通过。似乎显示什么是聪明的现实追求本拉登,极端的努力非常聪明和专门的人。和情报的恐怖分子。